How FSIBlog Creates, Reviews and Publishes Health Content
FSIBlog is committed to publishing health and wellness content that is accurate, evidence-based, and genuinely useful to every reader who finds it. This editorial policy explains the standards we hold ourselves to, how our content is created and reviewed, and what readers can expect from every article published on this site.
We believe that health information carries real responsibility. What people read about their health influences decisions they make about their bodies, their families, and their lives. That is why our editorial standards exist and why we take them seriously.
Every Article Medically Reviewed
All content is reviewed by a qualified health professional before publication.
Primary Sources Only
NHS, WHO, NICE, Mayo Clinic, PubMed and peer-reviewed journals are our evidence standard.
Content Updated Regularly
Articles are reviewed and updated when medical guidelines or clinical evidence changes.
Reader Safety First
Every article includes medical disclaimers and when to see a doctor guidance.
No Undisclosed Sponsorship
All commercial relationships are clearly labelled and never influence editorial content.
What FSIBlog Stands For
FSIBlog was founded on the belief that reliable health information should be accessible to everyone, not gatekept behind medical degrees or paywalls. The internet is full of health content that is inaccurate, alarmist, or written purely to rank on search engines rather than genuinely help the person reading it. FSIBlog exists to be different.
Our editorial mission is to produce health content that is medically accurate, written in plain English, and genuinely useful to real people managing real health situations. Every article we publish starts with a question a reader would actually ask, and every answer we give is backed by credible clinical evidence.
We cover a wide range of health topics including medical conditions, nutrition and diet, mental health and wellbeing, fitness and exercise, women's health, child health, preventive care, dental and oral health, skin health, and healthy lifestyle habits. In every category the same standards apply.
We Write for Readers, Not Search Engines
FSIBlog content is created to answer real health questions from real people. We do not produce content purely to rank in Google. If an article would not be useful to a reader without a search engine, it does not belong on FSIBlog. Every article must provide genuine value, insight, or practical guidance that the reader can act on.
Evidence-Based Content Always
Every health claim published on FSIBlog must be supported by evidence from credible medical sources. We do not publish unverified health claims, anecdotal evidence presented as medical fact, or content that contradicts established clinical guidelines without clearly contextualising why.
Plain English Without Compromise
Medical information should not require a medical degree to understand. FSIBlog writers are required to explain all clinical terminology in plain language immediately after first use. We write at a reading level that is accessible to any adult while never dumbing down or misrepresenting the clinical facts.
Editorial Independence
FSIBlog's editorial content is never influenced by advertisers, sponsors, or commercial partners. Paid partnerships and sponsored content exist separately from editorial content and are always clearly disclosed. No commercial relationship ever determines what health information FSIBlog publishes or how it is presented.
The Standards Every FSIBlog Article Must Meet
Before any article is published on FSIBlog it must meet every one of these editorial standards without exception.
Accuracy and Factual Correctness
Every factual health claim must be accurate at the time of publication and linked to a credible primary source. Statistics, percentages, drug dosages, symptom lists, and treatment recommendations must all be verified before an article goes live.
Source Quality and Citation
FSIBlog only cites primary or high-quality secondary sources. Acceptable sources include NHS, WHO, NICE, CDC, Mayo Clinic, WebMD where backed by original research, PubMed peer-reviewed journals, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Diabetes UK, and Mind UK.
No Diagnosing or Prescribing
FSIBlog articles never tell a reader they have a specific condition or prescribe specific treatments. We describe symptoms and inform readers about conditions but always direct them to consult a qualified GP or specialist for personal medical advice.
Medical Disclaimer on Every Article
Every FSIBlog health article must include a clear medical disclaimer stating that the content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. This disclaimer is non-negotiable and cannot be removed by contributors or editors.
When to See a Doctor Guidance
Every condition, symptom, or treatment article must include a section advising readers when to seek medical attention. This section lists warning signs that require urgent care and protects readers who may be experiencing a medical emergency while reading our content.
No Miracle Claims or Unsupported Promises
FSIBlog does not publish articles containing miracle cure claims, guaranteed weight loss promises, or any health assertion that is not supported by clinical evidence. Sensationalist health headlines that mislead readers about outcomes are never accepted regardless of how they might perform in search.
Originality and Plagiarism Policy
All content published on FSIBlog must be original and written exclusively for this platform. We run plagiarism checks on every submission and reject any article with more than 5% similarity to existing published content online. Self-plagiarism from a contributor's own previously published work is also not accepted.
Sensitive Topic Handling
Articles covering mental health crises, eating disorders, addiction, suicidal ideation, or self-harm are subject to additional editorial oversight. All such articles must end with signposting to professional support resources including Samaritans, Mind UK, and NHS mental health services.
Up-to-Date Clinical Guidance
Writers must use the most current medical guidelines available at the time of submission. If NHS or WHO guidance has been updated since a cited source was published, the current version must be used. FSIBlog does not accept articles that present outdated clinical information as current fact.
How Every FSIBlog Article Gets Made
Every article published on FSIBlog goes through a structured five-step editorial process from the moment an idea is proposed to the day it goes live.
Topic Research and Approval
Topics are proposed based on reader questions, search data, and emerging health research. The editorial team approves every topic before writing begins to ensure it meets our content standards and serves a genuine reader need.
Expert Writing with Full Sourcing
Articles are written by qualified health writers who reference primary sources throughout. Writers must provide source citations for every factual claim before submitting to editorial review.
Editorial Review and Editing
The lead health editor reviews every article for factual accuracy, source quality, tone, structure, and compliance with FSIBlog editorial standards. Revisions are requested before any article proceeds to medical review.
Medical Review and Fact Check
A qualified health professional independently reviews every article before publication. This includes verifying drug dosages, treatment descriptions, symptom accuracy, and compliance with current NHS and WHO clinical guidelines.
Publication and Ongoing Review
Published articles are monitored for clinical guideline changes and updated promptly when new evidence emerges. Update dates are clearly shown on all revised articles so readers always know how current the information is.
How FSIBlog Meets Google Health Content Standards
Health content falls under Google's YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) classification. FSIBlog fully complies with Google's E-E-A-T framework across all published content.
Experience
FSIBlog requires all contributors to demonstrate direct, first-hand experience with the health topics they cover. Writers with personal experience managing a condition, professional clinical backgrounds, caregiving experience, or significant research engagement produce content that goes beyond what a generic rewrite could achieve.
Generic health descriptions that could have been written without real knowledge of the topic are rejected at the editorial review stage.
Expertise
FSIBlog strongly prefers content from qualified healthcare professionals, registered nutritionists, certified personal trainers, mental health practitioners, pharmacists, and medical journalists with verifiable credentials.
All contributors must submit a complete author bio disclosing their relevant qualifications and background. Anonymous health articles are not accepted under any circumstances.
Authoritativeness
Every FSIBlog article is attributed to a named author with a published author bio. Authors are identified by their relevant qualifications and health expertise, building reader trust and satisfying Google's authoritativeness requirements for health content.
FSIBlog cites only high-authority external sources and does not treat other health blogs as primary medical evidence.
Trustworthiness
Trust is built through accuracy, transparency, and consistency. FSIBlog achieves this through mandatory medical disclaimers on every article, clear disclosure of all commercial relationships, regular content updates to reflect current clinical guidelines, and a transparent corrections policy that allows readers to report factual errors.
What We Expect from FSIBlog Contributors
FSIBlog welcomes qualified guest contributors. These are the non-negotiable standards every contributor must meet to publish on this platform.
Contributor Requirements
What Contributors Must Never Do
How FSIBlog Handles Advertising and Sponsored Content
FSIBlog generates revenue through advertising, sponsored content, and editorial partnerships with health brands, wellness companies, and medical organisations. This commercial activity is entirely separate from our editorial content and never influences what FSIBlog publishes or how health topics are covered.
All sponsored articles are clearly labelled with a prominent sponsored content disclosure at the top of the page. Sponsored content must meet the same editorial accuracy standards as organic content and cannot include unsubstantiated health claims, misleading statistics, or promotional language that misrepresents clinical evidence.
FSIBlog does not accept advertising from companies whose products or services are harmful to health, contradict established medical guidance, or promote treatments that lack credible clinical evidence. We reserve the right to decline any advertising or sponsorship that conflicts with our editorial values.
Display Advertising
FSIBlog displays third-party advertising including Google AdSense on some pages. Advertisers have no influence over editorial content decisions, article topics, or how health information is presented on the site. The presence of advertising on a page does not imply endorsement of the advertiser by FSIBlog.
Sponsored and Partner Content
Sponsored articles, branded content, and editorial partnerships are always clearly disclosed with a visible sponsored content label. Sponsored content is reviewed by our editorial team against the same medical accuracy standards as all other FSIBlog content. Commercial partners do not have editorial approval over how their topics are covered.
Affiliate Links
FSIBlog may include affiliate links to health products and services where relevant. All affiliate relationships are disclosed clearly at the top of any article containing them. Affiliate arrangements never influence which products are recommended or how they are described. We only recommend products we believe are genuinely useful to readers.
What We Will Never Do
FSIBlog will never allow a commercial relationship to result in inaccurate, misleading, or harmful health information being published. We will never recommend a health product because of a payment. We will never suppress negative health information about a product or company because of a commercial relationship. Editorial integrity is non-negotiable.
How FSIBlog Handles Errors and Content Updates
FSIBlog takes factual accuracy seriously. Despite our rigorous review process, errors can occasionally occur in health content, particularly as medical guidelines evolve. When an error is identified, we address it promptly and transparently.
Our Corrections Commitment
If a factual error is identified in any FSIBlog article, whether discovered internally or reported by a reader, the following steps are taken. The error is reviewed by our lead health editor and confirmed against primary medical sources. If confirmed, the article is corrected immediately and a correction note is added to the article noting what was changed and when. For significant medical errors that could have caused reader harm, the article is temporarily removed from publication while the correction is made. We thank every reader who takes the time to report an error and treat all correction requests with seriousness and respect. To report a factual error in any FSIBlog article please email fsiblog8@gmail.com with the article URL and the specific claim you believe to be inaccurate.
Regular Content Reviews
FSIBlog conducts scheduled reviews of published health articles to check for outdated clinical information. Articles are prioritised for review when NHS, WHO, or NICE guidelines are updated in the relevant topic area. All revised articles display a clearly visible last updated date so readers know how current the information is.
How to Report an Error
If you believe any health information published on FSIBlog is factually incorrect, outdated, or potentially harmful, please contact our editorial team directly at fsiblog8@gmail.com. Please include the article URL, the specific claim you are concerned about, and if possible the source that contradicts it. We take every report seriously and respond to all correction requests.
FSIBlog's Policy on AI-Generated Health Content
FSIBlog does not accept fully AI-generated health articles. Artificial intelligence tools may be used by contributors and editors as writing assistants for tasks such as grammar checking, structural outlining, or initial research summarisation, but the primary health content must be written by a human author with genuine medical knowledge who can personally verify every claim made in the article.
AI-generated health content frequently contains hallucinated medical statistics, outdated clinical guidance, and generic advice that lacks the accuracy, nuance, and real-world context required for safe health publishing. A contributor who cannot personally verify the health claims in their article should not be writing it.
FSIBlog editorial reviewers are trained to identify AI-generated content patterns including characteristic phrasing structures, absence of specific clinical detail, and statistically unsupported claims. Articles identified as primarily AI-generated are rejected and the contributor may be removed from the platform.
Common Questions About FSIBlog's Editorial Policy
Answers to the questions readers and contributors most often ask about how FSIBlog operates and what our standards mean in practice.
Read Health Content You Can Actually Trust
Every FSIBlog article is written to the standards described in this policy. Browse our full library of expert-reviewed health guides, or get in touch with our editorial team.